Orbital Stability - The best theory.
Publicado em 05 de novembro de 2008 por Alfredo Castro
ORBITAL STABILITY
(AUTOMATIC TRANSLATION.)
Elliptical orbits not be sustained without a direct refoulement, which is gradual, the central astro and vice versa, that is: this would be impossible for the current concepts of astrophysics, such as artificial satellites because not constantly monitored, such orbital astros or fall or scape of the central astro. Why: moons did not fall and not fleeing their planets, such as in relation to their stars, because they attract to the point of repelirem as equal poles of magnets turned to each other: their centers are full of antimatter (which, as otherwise the matter, all the repellent, and with force to have to do with heavy metals (barisfera - NIFE) and repels much to itself when desgarrada (poles of magnets equal)), which is positioned in the center of the astro, surrounded by a vacuum: the repulsive barrier of antimatter, who, under extreme compression and cohesion of the surrounding magma, is behaving as a solid, as demonstrated by the wave of compression detected by sismógrafos in activity. This repulsive effect of antimatter is agiganta with proximity, such as magnets, but in enormous proportions, causing the ellipsoid shape of orbits. The astros attraction of the material covering their orbital projections, while the repulsion of its antimatter is more centrally, the question that, as a balance of accuracy, a "permanent decline diverted," the acceleration inversely proportional to their distance, whose average is given the proportion between matter and antimatter of each astro. Reversing the direction of force, theoretically risking a formula that is just a slight modification of the law of gravitation: antimatter repels other antimatter, with strength: Fr = R.(am1. am2) / r3(ao cubo), and between matter and antimatter: Fr2 = R2. (m. am) / r4, where R and R2 are set to push for am. / am. at m. / am. respectively, to be measured with natural samples. Evidences:
1) The lunar craters were, in most cases not caused by the meteor impact, but by huge "bubbles" of antimatter (+ - 200 km) in some way that is detachment of the center antimaterial of the astro, and then were repelled for him, thus overcoming the lunar crust then in training and then in the space outside. I had the experience of pulling a chowder a ball on a string and graduated from soup a figure similar to a lunar crater, including a central high (inertial flow). Although it is established that meteors fall on the moon, as well as tiny meteorites, due to its almost nonexistent atmosphere, would not cause such redondinhas craters and long grooves external + - symmetrical, + - 500 km, but caused by large parts of the lunar crust in training (warm and soft), which were driven out of the way out of the bubble of antimatter (repulsive) cause of the crater, which in the case of a "explosão", would be sprayed instead of roll until it desmancharem (telescopic images, this IS Practice "writing" on the lunar surface);
2) The bubbles are trapped in the antimatter lunar crust by its cooling and hardening, are in greater quantity in the face of the moon so hidden, always "pulled" away from Earth, and there is at least an elevation, visible here with the Earth aid of a telescope, as the basis of a lunar crater: is another bubble that could not leave the moon, perhaps due to the rotation uncertain when the star was formed (the bubbles of antimatter beyond just the opposite to the Earth, which at that time ranged );
3) The relief of the hidden face of the moon is greater, as satellite photos, due to pressure of antimatter retained close to the surface, held in the lunar period of training;
4) Algol, binary in the constellation Perseus, with period + - 72 hours: only the antimatter to explain why, in hundreds of centuries, if not shocked, being in orbit of each other (the influence of other foreign astros would be the reason orbits of bankruptcy);
5) The flood tides of the new moon, opposite the sun + moon + earth + centrifugal force (add up the forces of repulsion of antimatter).
Final considerations: 1) Mercury is closest to the sun for little antimatter, which escaped in part (such as the craters of the moon - pictures of probes), 2) Maybe there is a type of matter that is more repelled by antimatter, that explain the orbits of comets and asteroids, and the rings of large planets further away from the sun because they have more matter than antimatter influential: it would be more targeted to specific refoulement "poles" of the planet, and the objects of the rings trainers fell to the part less repulsive: a sort of "orbital equator", valid for all astro-orbital systems. This "equator," at ground level, has reduced its gravity by the centrifugal force of rotation of the astro, + - offset by higher poles to push the astral-center antimatter. Authorize the disclosure, and I look forward opinions.
Author: Alfredo M. C. (tradução automática).
[email protected]
(Texto publicado em português no site webartigosos.com , autor Alfredo Castro, "Estabilidade Orbital Astronômica".)
(AUTOMATIC TRANSLATION.)
Elliptical orbits not be sustained without a direct refoulement, which is gradual, the central astro and vice versa, that is: this would be impossible for the current concepts of astrophysics, such as artificial satellites because not constantly monitored, such orbital astros or fall or scape of the central astro. Why: moons did not fall and not fleeing their planets, such as in relation to their stars, because they attract to the point of repelirem as equal poles of magnets turned to each other: their centers are full of antimatter (which, as otherwise the matter, all the repellent, and with force to have to do with heavy metals (barisfera - NIFE) and repels much to itself when desgarrada (poles of magnets equal)), which is positioned in the center of the astro, surrounded by a vacuum: the repulsive barrier of antimatter, who, under extreme compression and cohesion of the surrounding magma, is behaving as a solid, as demonstrated by the wave of compression detected by sismógrafos in activity. This repulsive effect of antimatter is agiganta with proximity, such as magnets, but in enormous proportions, causing the ellipsoid shape of orbits. The astros attraction of the material covering their orbital projections, while the repulsion of its antimatter is more centrally, the question that, as a balance of accuracy, a "permanent decline diverted," the acceleration inversely proportional to their distance, whose average is given the proportion between matter and antimatter of each astro. Reversing the direction of force, theoretically risking a formula that is just a slight modification of the law of gravitation: antimatter repels other antimatter, with strength: Fr = R.(am1. am2) / r3(ao cubo), and between matter and antimatter: Fr2 = R2. (m. am) / r4, where R and R2 are set to push for am. / am. at m. / am. respectively, to be measured with natural samples. Evidences:
1) The lunar craters were, in most cases not caused by the meteor impact, but by huge "bubbles" of antimatter (+ - 200 km) in some way that is detachment of the center antimaterial of the astro, and then were repelled for him, thus overcoming the lunar crust then in training and then in the space outside. I had the experience of pulling a chowder a ball on a string and graduated from soup a figure similar to a lunar crater, including a central high (inertial flow). Although it is established that meteors fall on the moon, as well as tiny meteorites, due to its almost nonexistent atmosphere, would not cause such redondinhas craters and long grooves external + - symmetrical, + - 500 km, but caused by large parts of the lunar crust in training (warm and soft), which were driven out of the way out of the bubble of antimatter (repulsive) cause of the crater, which in the case of a "explosão", would be sprayed instead of roll until it desmancharem (telescopic images, this IS Practice "writing" on the lunar surface);
2) The bubbles are trapped in the antimatter lunar crust by its cooling and hardening, are in greater quantity in the face of the moon so hidden, always "pulled" away from Earth, and there is at least an elevation, visible here with the Earth aid of a telescope, as the basis of a lunar crater: is another bubble that could not leave the moon, perhaps due to the rotation uncertain when the star was formed (the bubbles of antimatter beyond just the opposite to the Earth, which at that time ranged );
3) The relief of the hidden face of the moon is greater, as satellite photos, due to pressure of antimatter retained close to the surface, held in the lunar period of training;
4) Algol, binary in the constellation Perseus, with period + - 72 hours: only the antimatter to explain why, in hundreds of centuries, if not shocked, being in orbit of each other (the influence of other foreign astros would be the reason orbits of bankruptcy);
5) The flood tides of the new moon, opposite the sun + moon + earth + centrifugal force (add up the forces of repulsion of antimatter).
Final considerations: 1) Mercury is closest to the sun for little antimatter, which escaped in part (such as the craters of the moon - pictures of probes), 2) Maybe there is a type of matter that is more repelled by antimatter, that explain the orbits of comets and asteroids, and the rings of large planets further away from the sun because they have more matter than antimatter influential: it would be more targeted to specific refoulement "poles" of the planet, and the objects of the rings trainers fell to the part less repulsive: a sort of "orbital equator", valid for all astro-orbital systems. This "equator," at ground level, has reduced its gravity by the centrifugal force of rotation of the astro, + - offset by higher poles to push the astral-center antimatter. Authorize the disclosure, and I look forward opinions.
Author: Alfredo M. C. (tradução automática).
[email protected]
(Texto publicado em português no site webartigosos.com , autor Alfredo Castro, "Estabilidade Orbital Astronômica".)